This video was very fascinating, as the four stories would weave through each other.
Just as you felt that the first story was true, then the 2nd, 3rd and 4th got more
believable. However, in the end I believed the story that the Samaro told was the most
believable because there is a baby that comes into the last scene and he appeared to
have a personal attachment. Having raped the women, could it have been his baby?
Evidence about the baby probably would not be something that could be brought into
court, so proving his story would be hard. From personal knowledge of serving on a
jury, eyewitnesses can be guilty of not telling the truth and fabricating stories to fit
their own perspective.
